Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 76.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2016-07-28 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.14 x 2.98 x 0.28 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.75 ounces |
| Black | Black, Gold and Gray |
| Plastic | Metal |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 820 MSM8996 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Quad-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 530 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 21.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.01 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.5 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a global score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than Moto Z Force Droid Edition's 76.4 overall score. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a notably newer cellphone than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, although it's thicker and notably heavier. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit faster processor than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, and although they both have 4 GB of RAM, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has 4 more cores.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better looking screen than Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because although it has a bit smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1440 x 2560px, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also counts with a just a bit greater amount of pixels in each display inch.
The Moto Z Force Droid Edition shoots much better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, it also counts with a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way higher resolution camera. Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition has a superior storage capacity for applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Motorola Moto Z Force Droid Edition also has a SD memory slot that admits a maximum of 1,95 TB.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has improved battery duration than Moto Z Force Droid Edition, because it has a 29% bigger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.