Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 77.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2017-08-10 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.13 x 2.99 x 0.24 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.04 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 800.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 534 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 2730mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.72 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a global score of 80.1, which is slightly better than the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition's 77.4 general score. Galaxy XCover FieldPro's body is extremely newer, but incredibly thicker and notably heavier than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little more vivid screen than Moto Z2 Force Edition, because although it has a quite smaller display, and they both have an equal resolution of 1440 x 2560px, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also counts with a little more pixels per display inch.
Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition features a much bigger storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have equal internal storage capacity, the Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition also has a slot for an SD memory card that supports a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a little better performance than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition. Both have 4 GB of RAM memory and a Octa-Core CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much better battery lifetime than Motorola Moto Z2 Force Edition, because it has a 4500mAh battery size. Moto Z2 Force Edition captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot smaller diafragm aperture which is worse for low-light photos and videos and a smaller sensor taking worse quality photos and videos, and they both have the same resolution camera in the back, the Moto Z2 Force Edition also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs more money than the Moto Z2 Force Edition, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the Moto Z2 Force Edition. If you want to save some dollars, you can buy the Moto Z2 Force Edition, letting go some specs and features, but you'll get the most with your money.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.