Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 77.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-04-04 | 2018-08-16 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 297.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 835 MSM8998 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 280, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2450 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 540 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.34 inches (1/2.9") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than Moto Z3's 77.6 score. Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a newer cellphone than Moto Z3, but it's way heavier and much thicker. Both of these phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has older 8.0 Oreo version and Moto Z3 has Android 9.0 Pie version.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little more vivid display than Moto Z3, because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit superior processing unit than Moto Z3. Both have 4 GB of RAM memory and 8 processing cores.
Moto Z3 counts with a very superior storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have exactly the same 64 GB internal storage, the Moto Z3 also has an external SD slot that allows a maximum of 1,95 TB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a really longer battery lifetime than Moto Z3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Motorola Moto Z3 features a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much tinier aperture which is not recommended for low light photography and videos and a tinier camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photos, and they both have a same resolution back facing camera, the Motorola Moto Z3 also counts with a much higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Moto Z3, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Moto Z3. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, else you can save some money and buy the Moto Z3, letting go some specs and features.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.