Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 76.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2018-06-29 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.16 x 3.01 x 0.27 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.50 ounces |
| Black | 16 777 216 |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 500.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2160 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 402 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 636 SDM636 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 509 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1,95 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.66 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than Moto Z3 Play, having an 80.1 score against 76.3. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a newer cellphone than Moto Z3 Play, although it's much heavier and notably thicker. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit superior processor than Motorola Moto Z3 Play. They have a 4 GB RAM and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a sharper screen than Moto Z3 Play, because although it has a little smaller screen, it also counts with a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a higher display density. Motorola Moto Z3 Play shoots better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos, and they both have a same size sensor and a 12 MP back-facing camera, the Motorola Moto Z3 Play also counts with a lot better video resolution.
The Moto Z3 Play has much more memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have exactly the same internal memory, the Moto Z3 Play also has an external SD slot that allows up to 1,95 TB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much longer battery duration than Motorola Moto Z3 Play, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Motorola Moto Z3 Play, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as Motorola Moto Z3 Play. If you are trying to save a few dollars, you can get Motorola Moto Z3 Play, giving up a couple features, but you will get the most out of your budget.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.