Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-09-18 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.61 x 2.91 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.30 ounces |
| Black | Oxford blue |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 398.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765 SM7250-AA chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G has a global score of 84.6, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's global score of 80.1. The Motorola One 5G construction is a lot thinner and lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even when they were only released 6 months apart. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit more powerful processor than Motorola One 5G. They have a 4 GB RAM memory and a Octa-Core processing unit.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit more vivid display than Motorola One 5G, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a greater display pixel density. The Motorola One 5G counts with a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 128 GB internal memory capacity and a SD memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB.
Motorola One 5G features a bit better battery performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh. The Motorola One 5G captures greater videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a lot larger sensor taking lot better quality videos and photos, a way better 48 MP resolution back-facing camera and a lot higher 3840x2160 (4K) video quality.
In addition to being the best phone in our current comparison, Motorola One 5G is also a bargain compared to the other phones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.