Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 81.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-01-14 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.54 x 3.00 x 0.39 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.48 ounces |
| Black | Frosted silver and Volcanic grey |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 395.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | LTPS |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Motorola One 5G Ace is just a bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with a general score of 81.6 against 80.1. Motorola One 5G Ace's design is newer, somewhat lighter and much thinner than Galaxy XCover FieldPro. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much better looking display than Motorola One 5G Ace, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display pixel density and a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution.
Motorola One 5G Ace features a greater memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage, the Motorola One 5G Ace also has a SD card slot that allows up to 1 TB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit better processing power than Motorola One 5G Ace. They have a Octa-Core CPU and the same RAM memory amount.
Motorola One 5G Ace has just a little bit longer battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity instead of 4500mAh. The Motorola One 5G Ace features a very superior camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with a way higher resolution and a lot better 3840x2160 video definition.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones we are comparing here, Motorola One 5G Ace is also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes it an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.