Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 78.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-08-16 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.30 x 2.80 x 0.36 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.21 ounces |
| Black | Denim blue and Pearl white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 304.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2520 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 435 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9609 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 12.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0, EDR |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than the Motorola One Action, having an 80.1 score against 78.5. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro design is way heavier and noticeably thicker than Motorola One Action. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit better performance than Motorola One Action. They have 8 CPU cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little sharper display than Motorola One Action, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with a slightly better 1440 x 2560 resolution and more pixels per inch in the screen. The Motorola One Action has a superior camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture, and they both have a 12 mega-pixels back facing camera, the Motorola One Action also counts with a lot higher (4K) video quality.
Motorola One Action has a lot bigger memory capacity for applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a slot for external memory cards that allows up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal storage. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with improved battery lifetime than Motorola One Action, because it has a 29% more battery size.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than the Motorola One Action, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Motorola One Action. So if you want that extra features, you can buy the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but if you don't you can save some dollars and get the Motorola One Action, resigning some features and specs.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.