Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-12-04 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.37 x 3.02 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black | Dark amber, Deep Sea blue and Fresh orchid |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 350.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than Motorola One Hyper's 79.8 general score. Both phones in this comparison review use Android operating system, but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a newer 8.0 Oreo version while Motorola One Hyper has Android 11. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a notably heavier and much thicker phone than Motorola One Hyper.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a better display than Motorola One Hyper, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 resolution and a better pixel number in each inch of screen. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit better processor than Motorola One Hyper. They have a Octa-Core processor and a 4 GB RAM memory.
Motorola One Hyper features a much bigger memory for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a little bit longer battery lifetime than Motorola One Hyper, because it has a 13 percent greater battery capacity.
Motorola One Hyper counts with a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way tinier aperture which is not so good for capturing images and videos in low light environments, it also counts with a much higher video definition and a back facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than Motorola One Hyper, and it doesn't have such a good price and quality relation as the Motorola One Hyper. If you are trying to save some dollars, you can get Motorola One Hyper, giving up a few features and specs, but you'll get the most with your savings.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.