Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 81.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 12 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2022-08-18 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.57 x 3.14 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.05 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | P-OLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Snapdragon 8+ Gen 1 (4 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo, 64-bit (Octa-Core 3200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 730 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 5.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Motorola razr (2022) has a global score of 81.1, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 global score. Both devices in this comparison have Android operating system, but Motorola razr (2022) has the previous 12 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Motorola razr (2022) is a much newer cellphone, and it is also notably lighter and noticeably thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
The Motorola razr (2022) has just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core processor, the Motorola razr (2022) also has a greater amount of RAM memory. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better looking screen than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater screen pixel density.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a greater storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Motorola razr (2022), because although it has 0 less internal storage, it also counts with a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB. The Motorola razr (2022) counts with a greater camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a much smaller camera aperture which is worse for taking photographs and video in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot higher video definition and a much higher resolution camera in the back.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with superior battery performance than Motorola razr (2022), because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.