Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Motorola |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 15 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2025-04-24 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | -- |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | -- |
| -- | LTPO |
| 576 pixels per inch | -- |
| -- | 4500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 5.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 8 Elite SM8750-AB (3 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 16 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 830 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.3 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 512 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 17.6 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 50.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (30 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | -- |
| Mobile Hotspot | -- |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4700mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.56 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.4 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than the Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), having an 80.1 score against 79.2. Both phones we are comparing have Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) has Android 15, so it gives you lots of additional features.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much greater performance than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have the same number of cores. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with an incredibly better looking screen than Motorola Razr Ultra (2025), although it has a way smaller display.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) counts with a much better storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 448 GB more internal storage. The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) takes a lot better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a way better 50 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera and a way higher video definition.
The Motorola Razr Ultra (2025) features a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 4 percent more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.