Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 75.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-09-30 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.29 x 2.96 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.35 ounces |
| Black | Charcoal, Cyan green and Ice |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 3) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 660 SDM660 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 260, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 512 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.9 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is a bit better than Nokia 7.2's global score of 75.9. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's body is incredibly heavier and way thicker than the Nokia 7.2. Both of these devices include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has newer 8.0 Oreo version while Nokia 7.2 has Android 10 version, so it gives a couple additional features and performance improvements.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little more vivid display than Nokia 7.2, because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Nokia 7.2 has a much greater memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a SD extension slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Nokia 7.2 also has more internal memory.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit superior CPU than Nokia 7.2, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features greater battery performance than Nokia 7.2, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity. The Nokia 7.2 shoots greater pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller camera aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video definition and the same video frame rate, the Nokia 7.2 also counts with a much bigger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality and a way more megapixels camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.