Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 80.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-11-12 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.77 x 3.09 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.97 ounces |
| Black | Meteor grey |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass) and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 700.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 387 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7225 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 12.98 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 24.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.43 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a general score of 80.3, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's general score of 80.1. The Nokia 8 V 5G UW design is somewhat lighter and incredibly thinner than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even when they were released with only a couple months difference. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but the Nokia 8 V 5G UW has 10 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more powerful processor than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, although it has lesser RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a brighter screen than Nokia 8 V 5G UW, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher pixel density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Nokia 8 V 5G UW counts with a quite bigger memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same internal memory capacity, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW also has a SD extension slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Nokia 8 V 5G UW's battery performance is just as good as Galaxy XCover FieldPro's battery performance.
Nokia 8 V 5G UW has a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not favorable for shooting photos in low-light situations, it also counts with a way larger sensor taking more light and vivid colors, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution and a back-facing camera with a lot higher 64 mega-pixels resolution.
Despite of being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Nokia 8 V 5G UW is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.