Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 80.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Nokia |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-07-29 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.76 x 3.21 x 0.42 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 10.02 ounces |
| Black | Granite Gre and Ultra Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 550.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 550 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.5 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 480 SM4350 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 460 Gold, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.43 inches (1/2.3") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4630mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.48 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Nokia XR20 has an overall score of 80.8, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's general score of 80.1. Nokia XR20's construction is newer and way thinner, but just a little bit heavier than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro. Both of these phones use Android OS (operating system), but Nokia XR20 has 11 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit superior processor than Nokia XR20, although it has a smaller amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little bit better looking screen than Nokia XR20, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater pixel number per display inch.
The Nokia XR20 takes much better videos and photos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not nice for capturing photos in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Nokia XR20 also counts with a lot more mega pixels camera and a larger sensor.
The Nokia XR20 has a lot bigger memory capacity to install games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have an external memory card slot that supports up to 512 GB, the Nokia XR20 also has more internal memory capacity. The Nokia XR20 has a little longer battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 4630mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
In addition to being the best phone in this comparison, the Nokia XR20 is also a lot cheaper.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.