Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-10-16 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.76 x 3.09 x 0.38 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.58 ounces |
| Black | Cyber shade |
| Plastic | Aluminum |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 600.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (15 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than nubia Red Magic 3S, having a score of 80.1 against 75.8. These phones use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the older 8.0 Oreo version while nubia Red Magic 3S has Android 9.0 Pie version. Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better phone than nubia Red Magic 3S, we must highlight that it's also a incredibly thicker and heavier phone.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little sharper screen than nubia Red Magic 3S, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per inch of screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Nubia Red Magic 3S features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a Octa-Core CPU, the nubia Red Magic 3S also has a greater amount of RAM.
The nubia Red Magic 3S shoots greater pictures and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low light images, it also counts with a much larger sensor providing a way better image quality, a lot better video resolution and a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
The nubia Red Magic 3S features a greater storage for applications and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no slot for an SD memory card, it also counts with more internal memory. The nubia Red Magic 3S has just a little better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the nubia Red Magic 3S, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the nubia Red Magic 3S. So if you want that extra specs, you can buy Galaxy XCover FieldPro, else you can save some money and buy the nubia Red Magic 3S, giving up some features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.