Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | OnePlus |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-10-18 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.40 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.27 ounces |
| Black | Haze blue |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 432.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 513 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4085mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than OnePlus 7T Pro's 75.8 global score. Despite being the best cellphone we are comparing here, we must highlight that it's also somewhat heavier and much thicker. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little bit better looking display than OnePlus 7T Pro, because although it has a quite lower 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a much smaller screen, it also counts with a quite greater screen pixels density.
OnePlus 7T Pro has a bit better processor than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OnePlus 7T Pro also has more RAM. The OnePlus 7T Pro features more storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD extension slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
OnePlus 7T Pro features a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for low-light images and video, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality, a camera in the back with a much better resolution and a lot bigger camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit longer battery lifetime than OnePlus 7T Pro, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity instead of 4085mAh.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is way more expensive than OnePlus 7T Pro, and it doesn't have such a good relation between it's price and quality as the OnePlus 7T Pro. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, else you can save some money and buy the OnePlus 7T Pro, letting go a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.