Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 80.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | OnePlus |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-12-06 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.40 x 2.99 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.41 ounces |
| Black | Papaya orange |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) and Metal |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 432.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3120 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 513 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855+ SM8150-AC chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2960 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.60 aperture |
| -- | 17.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4085mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren is a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with an 80.1 score against 80.1. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren has older 10 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren's construction is somewhat lighter and way thinner than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although both of them were released only 4 months apart.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little bit better looking screen than OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren, because although it has a bit lower 1440 x 2560px resolution and a really smaller screen, it also counts with a just a little greater pixel number per inch in the display. The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren has a better storage capacity for apps and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD memory slot, it also counts with more internal memory.
OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren has a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren also has more RAM. OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren features a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photos and videos, it also counts with a way higher 48 mega-pixels resolution back facing camera, a lot better 3840x2160 video definition and a much larger sensor which offers a lot better photo and video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better battery performance than OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren, because it has a 10 percent bigger battery size.
The OnePlus 7T Pro 5G McLaren is not only the best devices of the ones we compare here, but it's also by far the cheapest.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.