Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 77.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | OnePlus |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-04-21 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.51 x 2.93 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black | Glacial green |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 747.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.8 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3168 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 512 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1300 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 9.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865 SM8250 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 25.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.71 inches (1/1.4") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4510mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.4 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than the OnePlus 8 Pro, with a global score of 80.1 against 77.2. Even being the best device in this comparison review, Galaxy XCover FieldPro's design is noticeably heavier and notably thicker than OnePlus 8 Pro. The OnePlus 8 Pro features a bit better looking display than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a just a bit lower pixel density, it also counts with a lot larger display and a bit higher 1440 x 3168 resolution.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with more memory capacity for apps and games than OnePlus 8 Pro, because although it has 0 less internal memory capacity, it also counts with a slot for an external memory card that holds a maximum of 512 GB. The OnePlus 8 Pro counts with a bit superior CPU than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the OnePlus 8 Pro also has a higher amount of RAM memory.
OnePlus 8 Pro counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and video, it also counts with a back camera with a way better 48 mega-pixels resolution, a way better video quality and a much bigger sensor providing a much higher image quality.
OnePlus 8 Pro has a little better battery lifetime than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 0% greater battery size.
Although Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it is a lot more expensive than OnePlus 8 Pro, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as the OnePlus 8 Pro. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, else you can save a couple dollars and get the OnePlus 8 Pro, resigning some specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.