Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-05-21 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.28 x 2.85 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.03 ounces |
| Black | Moonlight Black and Starry Blue |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.66 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4025mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.1 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass and Gyroscope |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than the OPPO Find X2 Neo's 77.7 score. Both devices in this comparison review include Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has newer 8.0 Oreo version and OPPO Find X2 Neo has Android 10 version, giving some nice extra features and increased performance. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's body is extremely heavier and noticeably thicker than OPPO Find X2 Neo.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little sharper display than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixels amount in each inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with a greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no SD memory card expansion slot, it also counts with more internal memory capacity.
The OPPO Find X2 Neo counts with just a bit better processing power than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the OPPO Find X2 Neo also has a greater amount of RAM. OPPO Find X2 Neo takes way better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier camera aperture which is worse for low light images and videos, it also counts with a much bigger sensor shooting much better quality photos and videos, a back-facing camera with a much higher 48 megapixels resolution and a way higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit superior battery life than OPPO Find X2 Neo, because it has a 12 percent larger battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.