Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 77 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Oppo |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | -- |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.30 x 2.88 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.24 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| Plastic | Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| -- | 800 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 1200 MT6893 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Cortex-A78, 64-bit, 6 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G77 MC9 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 1.36 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has an overall score of 80.1, which is slightly better than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G's overall score of 77. These phones include Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has Android 11. Despite being the best in this review, Galaxy XCover FieldPro's body is a lot thicker and noticeably heavier than the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit sharper screen than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G, because although it has a much smaller screen, it also counts with a better 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a greater amount of pixels per display inch. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G features a bit better processing power than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G also has a greater amount of RAM memory.
The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a way better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, it also counts with a way better video definition and a much better resolution back-facing camera. The OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G has a greater memory for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no external SD slot, it also counts with 192 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a way better battery duration than OPPO Reno6 Pro 5G.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.