Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 76.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-06-29 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.61 x 3.02 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.81 ounces |
| Black | Black |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 194.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Mediatek Helio P35 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | PowerVR GE8320 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.35 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A21's 76.1 global score. Despite being the best device in our current comparison, we must note that it is also notably thicker and heavier. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a newer 8.0 Oreo version and Samsung Galaxy A21 has Android 10 version.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit faster processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A21, and although they both have 8 CPU cores, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a larger amount of RAM. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A21, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a way better pixels quantity per display inch.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a quite bigger storage for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy A21, and although they both have an external SD slot that allows up to 512 GB, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy A21 takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light images and a tinier back camera sensor providing a lower image quality, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video resolution, the Samsung Galaxy A21 also counts with a back-facing camera with a lot better resolution.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy A21, because it has a 13% greater battery capacity.
Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a better device, it costs a lot more money than the Samsung Galaxy A21, and it doesn't have such a good quality/price relation as Samsung Galaxy A21. So if you need that extra features and specs, you can buy Galaxy XCover FieldPro, otherwise you can save some dollars and get the Samsung Galaxy A21, giving up a couple features and specifications.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.