Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 77.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-06-19 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.44 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.77 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Red and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1600 x 720 pixels |
| -- | TFT |
| 576 pixels per inch | 270 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Samsung Exynos 850 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G76 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.84 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A21s's 77.7 general score. Both phones we compare here include Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version and Samsung Galaxy A21s has Android 10, so it provides some extra features and improved performance. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro design is incredibly heavier and noticeably thicker than the Samsung Galaxy A21s.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A21s, and although they both have 8 processing cores, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a greater amount of RAM memory. Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much sharper display than Galaxy A21s, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a much higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and much more pixels per display inch.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy A21s, and although they both have a SD memory slot that allows up to 512 GB, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has 32 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy A21s counts with just a little better battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Galaxy A21s features a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way smaller aperture, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A21s also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor capturing much higher quality photographs and a way higher resolution back-facing camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.