Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 84.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-06-24 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.58 x 3.01 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.16 ounces |
| Black | Gray, Mint, Violet and White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 399 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | MediaTek Dimensity 700 MT6833V (7 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Cortex-A76, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G57 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 13.02 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with an 84.6 score against 80.1. The Samsung Galaxy A22 5G is a newer cellphone, and it is also way lighter and notably thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. These devices work with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A22 5G has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A22 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher count of pixels per inch of display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little faster CPU than Galaxy A22 5G. Both of them have the same RAM amount and a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Galaxy A22 5G has a much better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not good for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 video definition, the Galaxy A22 5G also counts with a back facing camera with a lot better 48 MP resolution.
Galaxy A22 5G has a better memory for applications, games, photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same internal storage, the Galaxy A22 5G also has a slot for an external memory card that admits up to 1 TB. The Galaxy A22 5G counts with a bit better battery performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.