Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 79.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2023-12-11 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.34 x 3.01 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.95 ounces |
| Black | Brave Black, Fantasy Blue, Optimistic Blue and Personality Yellow |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 396 pixels per inch |
| -- | 1000 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Exynos 1280 (5 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G68 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 11.11 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G) and LTE (4G) |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 9.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is slightly better than Galaxy A25 5G, with an 80.1 score against 79.9. Despite being the best cellphone we are comparing, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro construction is incredibly older, notably heavier and thicker than Galaxy A25 5G. Both of these devices come with Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more recent 8.0 Oreo version while Galaxy A25 5G has Android 14 version, so it provides the user a lot of extra features and performance improvements.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much greater processing power than Galaxy A25 5G, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have the same number of cores. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a slightly better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy A25 5G, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a better screen pixel density.
The Galaxy A25 5G has a much greater storage capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a SD card slot that holds a maximum of 1 TB and 64 GB more internal memory. The Galaxy A25 5G captures greater pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller sensor which offers a worse photo and video quality and a smaller aperture which is worse for taking pictures and video in low light situations, it also counts with a lot better (4K) video quality and a lot more mega pixels back facing camera.
Galaxy A25 5G features a bit superior battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an 11 percent larger battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.