Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 79.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-03-02 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.82 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue and White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.46 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than Samsung Galaxy A30, getting an 80.1 score against 79.6. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro body is newer than Samsung Galaxy A30's, although it is a lot heavier and notably thicker. The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a better looking display than Galaxy A30, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a better pixel quantity per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Galaxy A30's storage for games and applications is just as good as Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's one, they have a SD memory card expansion slot that holds up to 512 GB and the same internal storage. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A30. Both of them have 8 CPU cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A30, because it has a 13% bigger battery size. Samsung Galaxy A30 captures much clearer photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier back camera sensor shooting lower quality pictures and videos and a tinier aperture which is not good for taking photographs and videos in low light situations, and they both have the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A30 also counts with a much better 16 MP resolution camera.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.