Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 79.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-09-20 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.24 x 2.94 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1560 x 720 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 268 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.2 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 25.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a little bit better than Galaxy A30s, getting a general score of 80.1 against 79.8. Although Galaxy XCover FieldPro is better than Galaxy A30s, it must be noted that it's also a much heavier and notably thicker device. Both phones we compare here come with Android operating system, but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version and Galaxy A30s has Android 11 version, giving a couple nice extra features and performance enhancements.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a much sharper screen than Galaxy A30s, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a lot better screen pixel density and a much higher 1440 x 2560px resolution. The Galaxy A30s has a much better storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have an external memory card slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A30s also has 64 GB more internal storage.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better hardware performance than Samsung Galaxy A30s. Both have the same RAM memory amount and a Octa-Core processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy A30s counts with a better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for low-light photography and videos, and they both have the same (Full HD) video definition and the same video frame rate, the Samsung Galaxy A30s also counts with a much more MP camera.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit longer battery duration than Samsung Galaxy A30s, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.