Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 81.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-04-27 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.27 x 2.88 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.53 ounces |
| Black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush red and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 411 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | MediaTek Helio P65 MT6768 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A75 and Arm Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 12 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G52 MC2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.09 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 10.89 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A31 is a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having an 81.3 score against 80.1. The Galaxy A31 construction is extremely lighter and notably thinner than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although they were released with only 1 months difference. Both of these phones include Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A31 has older 10 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a slightly better display than Galaxy A31, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better pixel number in each inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Galaxy A31 and Galaxy XCover FieldPro count with quite similar storage to install games and applications, both of them have exactly the same internal storage capacity and an external memory slot that supports up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little better performance than Galaxy A31. They have 4 GB of RAM and the same number of cores. The Galaxy A31 features just a little bit longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity against 4500mAh. The Galaxy A31 has a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way tinier aperture which is not good for capturing images in poorly lited environments, and they both have the same video frame rate and the same (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A31 also counts with a way more mega-pixels camera and a much larger back-facing camera sensor shooting lot better quality photos and videos.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.