Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 79.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 14 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2024-03-11 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.37 x 3.07 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.37 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 390 pixels per inch |
| -- | 500 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Exynos 1380 (5 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G68 MP5 GPU |
| 9.45 | 6.12 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 50.00 MP + 13.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.51 inches (1/1.96") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 11.44 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G) and HSDPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Nano SIM Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.3 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than the Galaxy A35 5G, with a global score of 80.1 against 79.4. Despite being the best device in this review, Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a way older, a lot thicker and somewhat heavier device than Galaxy A35 5G. Both phones in this comparison review use Android operating system, but the Galaxy XCover FieldPro has the newer 8.0 Oreo version while Galaxy A35 5G has Android 14, so it gives a lot of extra features.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better number of pixels per inch in the display and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a lot better hardware performance than Galaxy A35 5G, although it has lesser RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a better memory to store more apps and games than Samsung Galaxy A35 5G, because although it has less internal storage capacity, it also counts with a SD memory slot that holds up to 512 GB. The Samsung Galaxy A35 5G features a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not nice for taking photographs or video in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot bigger back-facing camera sensor capturing more light and vivid colors, a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video quality and a way higher resolution back facing camera.
The Galaxy A35 5G features a little longer battery performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5000mAh battery size against 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.