Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 86.6 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-10-20 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.24 x 2.93 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.86 ounces |
| Black | Prism crush black, Prism crush green, Prism crush violet and Prism crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 9610 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 13.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A50s is a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a general score of 86.6 against 80.1. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A50s has the older 10 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Although Galaxy A50s and the Galaxy XCover FieldPro were only released 6 months apart, Galaxy A50s is way lighter and extremely thinner.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit faster processing unit than Galaxy A50s, although it has less RAM memory, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A50s, because although it has a really smaller display, it also counts with a better pixels quantity per inch of display and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560.
Samsung Galaxy A50s shoots a lot better videos and photos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way tinier camera aperture which is worse for low-light photos, it also counts with a way larger back-facing camera sensor, a back facing camera with a lot higher 48 megapixels resolution and a way better (4K) video resolution.
The Galaxy A50s counts with a much greater memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have an external memory slot that allows up to 512 GB, the Galaxy A50s also has 64 GB more internal memory. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit better battery life than Galaxy A50s, because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.