Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 85.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-12-27 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.24 x 2.90 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 282.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.92 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy A51 has a global score of 85.5, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 score. Galaxy A51 is a much lighter and a lot thinner device than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even when both of them were only released with a couple of months difference. Both of these devices come with Android OS (Operating System), but Galaxy A51 has 11 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy A51, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 and a greater pixel count in each inch of display. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more powerful processing unit than Samsung Galaxy A51. Both have the same number of cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Galaxy A51 has a greater camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way tinier camera aperture, it also counts with a back facing camera with lot more megapixels, a way bigger back camera sensor which offers a way higher photo and video quality and a way higher video quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 has much more storage to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have an external memory card slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy A51 also has 128 GB internal memory capacity. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little better battery life than Samsung Galaxy A51, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity.
Even being the best phone in our comparison, the Galaxy A51 is also by far the cheapest one, making buying this phone an easy decision.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.