Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-04-29 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.26 x 2.90 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.60 ounces |
| Black | Prism cube black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 339.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Samsung Exynos 980 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A77 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G76 MP5 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (480 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has a global score of 90.8, which is much better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 general score. Both of these devices come with Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy A51 5G has the older 11 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's design is way lighter and incredibly thinner than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though both of them were released with only 1 months difference.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little more vivid display than Galaxy A51 5G, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better pixels count in each inch of display. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit superior processor than Galaxy A51 5G, although it has less RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
The Galaxy A51 5G features a lot bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 1000 GB and more internal storage capacity. The Galaxy A51 5G features a way better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for low-light photography, it also counts with a lot better video resolution, a way better resolution back facing camera and a much larger sensor providing a much better image quality.
The Samsung Galaxy A51 5G's battery duration is just as good as the battery duration in Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
In addition to being the best phone of the ones in this comparison, the Galaxy A51 5G is also very cheap compared to the other phones.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.