Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 90.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-03-17 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy A52 is better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a 90.7 score against 80.1. The Galaxy A52 is a newer cellphone, and it's also notably thinner and lighter than Galaxy XCover FieldPro. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a little better processing power than Galaxy A52, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have 8 CPU cores.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy A52, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per display inch and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Galaxy A52 counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for capturing photographs and videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a lot larger back-facing camera sensor shooting much higher quality photos and videos, a camera with a way higher 64 mega-pixels resolution and a way better video resolution.
Galaxy A52 counts with much more memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 64 GB more internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that allows up to 1 TB. Galaxy A52 counts with a battery performance that's just as good as Galaxy XCover FieldPro's battery lifetime.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.