Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 91.3 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 12, 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-03-19 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black | -- |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 750G SM7225 (8 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 570, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 619 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a 91.3 score against 80.1. The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G is a newer cellphone, and it is also thinner and way lighter than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro. These phones come with Android OS (Operating System), but Samsung Galaxy A52 5G has the older 12 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy A52 5G, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display density and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit faster CPU than Galaxy A52 5G, although it has 2 GB lesser RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU.
The Samsung Galaxy A52 5G features a very superior camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for capturing images in low light situations, it also counts with a lot higher 3840x2160 video definition, a much better resolution back-facing camera and a lot larger sensor.
The Galaxy A52 5G has a much better storage capacity to store more apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a SD card slot that supports up to 1 TB and 64 GB more internal storage. The Galaxy A52 5G has a battery performance that's very similar to the Galaxy XCover FieldPro one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.