Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 91.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-09-01 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.30 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.67 ounces |
| Black | Awesome Black, Awesome Mint, Awesome Violet and Awesome White |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.5 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 405 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 778G SM7325 (6 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 670, 64-bit (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 642L GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (60 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy A52s is better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with a 91.1 score against 80.1. Both of these phones have Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy A52s has older 11 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Samsung Galaxy A52s is a newer cellphone, and it is also extremely thinner and a lot lighter than Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit sharper screen than Galaxy A52s, because although it has a really smaller screen, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a better number of pixels per inch in the display. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A52s, although it has less RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit.
The Samsung Galaxy A52s takes a lot better photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low light photos and video, it also counts with a much larger back-facing camera sensor taking way higher quality videos and photos, a lot better 64 megapixels resolution back-facing camera and a way higher 3840x2160 video definition.
The Galaxy A52s features a very superior memory capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has more internal storage capacity and a SD memory card expansion slot that supports up to 1 TB. The Samsung Galaxy A52s's battery performance is very similar to the Galaxy XCover FieldPro one.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.