Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 75.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2017-01-13 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.17 x 3.06 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black | Black sky, Blue mist, Gold sand and Peach cloud |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 4) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1920 x 1080 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 7.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7880 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1900 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-T830 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 32 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 8.88 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3600mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.6 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a general score of 80.1, which is a little bit better than the Galaxy A7 (2017)'s 75.8 general score. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a extremely newer phone than Galaxy A7 (2017), but it's extremely thicker and incredibly heavier. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a more vivid screen than Galaxy A7 (2017), because although it has a bit smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution and a higher pixels count in each screen inch.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a very superior storage capacity to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has more internal memory and a slot for external memory cards that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit faster processor than Galaxy A7 (2017), and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a larger amount of RAM.
The Galaxy A7 (2017) captures better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot tinier camera aperture, and they both have the same 1920x1080 video resolution and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy A7 (2017) also counts with a much more mega pixels camera.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with superior battery lifetime than Galaxy A7 (2017), because it has a 25% more battery size.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.