Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 87.5 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-01-31 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.44 x 2.99 x 0.30 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.31 ounces |
| Black | Prism Crush black, Prism Crush blue, Prism Crush pink and Prism Crush white |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 411.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 has a general score of 87.5, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 global score. The Galaxy A71 is a a lot thinner and incredibly lighter device than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even when they were released with only 2 months difference. Both of these phones work with Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy A71 has an older 11 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a more vivid display than Galaxy A71, because although it has a lot smaller screen, it also counts with a better display pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Galaxy A71 has a superior storage capacity for apps and games than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a SD memory slot that allows a maximum of 512 GB, the Galaxy A71 also has 64 GB more internal memory.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy A71, although it has a smaller amount of RAM, they both have a Octa-Core processing unit. The Samsung Galaxy A71 and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro both have quite similar batteries duration. Samsung Galaxy A71 takes much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much bigger camera sensor shooting much higher quality pictures, a back camera with much more MP and a much better video quality.
Samsung Galaxy A71 not only is the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it a great choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.