Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 92.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-07-16 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.41 x 2.98 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black | Prism bricks black |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 650.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 765G SM7250-AB chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 475, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2400 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 620 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.45 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.21 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy A71 5G UW has a general score of 92.9, which is much better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's score of 80.1. The Galaxy A71 5G UW is a way thinner and lighter cellphone than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even when both were only released 3 months apart. These phones work with Android OS, but Galaxy A71 5G UW has 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a processor that's just as good as the Galaxy XCover FieldPro one, and although the Galaxy A71 5G UW has 4 GB more RAM, they both have a Octa-Core CPU. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more vivid screen than Galaxy A71 5G UW, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a better amount of pixels per inch in the screen and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW has a way bigger storage to install applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for an external memory card that allows a maximum of 1000 GB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro and Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW feature extremely similar batteries.
Galaxy A71 5G UW counts with a lot better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture, it also counts with a much better resolution back camera, a way larger sensor capturing much higher quality pictures and a way higher 3840x2160 video definition.
Samsung Galaxy A71 5G UW not only is the best devices of the ones we are comparing, but it's also by far the cheapest one, making it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.