Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 79.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2018-01-06 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.87 x 2.78 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.07 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Gold and Orchid grey |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 5) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.6 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2220 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 441 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.3 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Samsung Exynos 5 Octa 7885 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G71 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 16.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | -- |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.24 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.3 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 4.96 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro is a bit better than the Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), with an 80.1 score against 79.2. Even though Galaxy XCover FieldPro is extremely newer than the Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), it is extremely heavier and much thicker. Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit superior CPU than Galaxy A8 (2018). Both of them have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit better looking screen than Galaxy A8 (2018), because although it has a little bit smaller display, it also counts with a greater number of pixels per inch of screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has just a bit bigger storage to install games and applications than Galaxy A8 (2018), and although they both have the same 64 GB internal memory capacity, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a slot for SD memory cards that holds a maximum of 512 GB.
Galaxy A8 (2018) shoots better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light images and video, and they both have the same video frame rates and the same 1920x1080 (Full HD) video quality, the Galaxy A8 (2018) also counts with a much better resolution camera.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much better battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy A8 (2018), because it has a 4500mAh battery capacity against 3000mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.