Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 85.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-10-16 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.27 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.74 ounces |
| Black | Fusion black, Fusion blue and Fusion green |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.36 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 12.1 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.6 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy F41 has an overall score of 85.2, which is a little bit better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 general score. Both phones we compare here use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy F41 has an older 11 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version. The Galaxy F41 construction is a lot thinner and much lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even when both of them were released only a couple of months apart.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a little better performance than Galaxy F41, although it has 2 GB less RAM memory, they both have 8 processing cores. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more vivid display than Samsung Galaxy F41, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels and a greater screen density.
The Samsung Galaxy F41's memory capacity for apps and games is very similar to the Galaxy XCover FieldPro one, both of them have a slot for external memory cards that supports up to 512 GB and equal 64 GB internal storage capacity. The Samsung Galaxy F41 has improved battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 6000mAh battery capacity.
Galaxy F41 takes a lot better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not so good for shooting pictures or video in low light situations, it also counts with a way higher (4K) video resolution, a much bigger sensor capturing more light and vivid colors and a back-facing camera with a lot higher 64 megapixels resolution.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.