Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 88.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2021-02-22 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.69 ounces |
| Black | Laser Blue, Laser Green and Laser Grey |
| Plastic | -- |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Exynos 9825 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Cortex-A55, 7 nm (Quad-Core 2730 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | ARM Mali-G76 MP12 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1 TB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.42 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.59 inches (1/1.7") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 11.99 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy F62 is better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with an 88.1 score against 80.1. Galaxy F62's construction is newer, somewhat lighter and thinner than Galaxy XCover FieldPro. These phones use Android operating system, but the Galaxy F62 has an older 11 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy F62, because although it has a lower amount of RAM, it also counts with more processing cores (although they are slower). The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little sharper screen than Galaxy F62, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a higher display density and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution.
Galaxy F62 counts with a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture, it also counts with a much more mega-pixels back-facing camera, a much higher (4K) video definition and a lot larger back camera sensor providing a way better image quality. Samsung Galaxy F62 has a way bigger storage capacity for applications, games, photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 128 GB internal storage capacity and a slot for SD memory cards that holds up to 1 TB.
The Samsung Galaxy F62 has a way better battery performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity instead of 4500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.