Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 78.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-02-05 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.16 x 2.93 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.56 ounces |
| Black | Charcoal black and Ocean blue |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 8.91 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 8.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 12.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.02 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a global score of 80.1, which is just a bit better than the Galaxy M20's global score of 78.9. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro design is newer than Galaxy M20's, although it's extremely heavier and much thicker. These devices use Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy XCover FieldPro has 8.0 Oreo version and Galaxy M20 has Android 10 version, so it provides you a couple additional features.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better processing unit than Galaxy M20. Both of them have a Octa-Core processor and the same RAM amount. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much better looking display than Samsung Galaxy M20, because although it has a little smaller display, it also counts with more pixels per inch of display and a higher 1440 x 2560px resolution.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro and the Galaxy M20 count with quite similar memory capacity for games and applications, both have a slot for an SD memory card that allows a maximum of 512 GB and exactly the same internal memory. The Galaxy M20 captures much better photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way smaller camera aperture which is not so good for shooting photos and/or video in low-light environments and a tinier back camera sensor which provides a worse image and video quality, and they both have the same video definition and the same video frame rate, the Galaxy M20 also counts with a more MP back-facing camera.
The Galaxy M20 has a little better battery performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 5000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.