Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 84.1 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-03-23 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.35 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.63 ounces |
| Black | Midnight blue and Raven black |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 403 pixels per inch |
| -- | 420 cd/m2 brightness |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.4 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Exynos 9611 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Arm Cortex-A73 and Arm Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G72 MP3 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 11.74 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 48.00 MP + 20.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.00 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.5 inches (1/2") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 11.55 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 6000mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 7.52 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M21 is a bit better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, with an 84.1 score against 80.1. Galaxy M21 is a a lot lighter and much thinner phone than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even when they were released only a couple months apart. Both of these devices have Android OS (operating system), but the Galaxy M21 has an older 11 version and Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little more vivid display than Galaxy M21, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a better display density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution. Samsung Galaxy M21 features as much storage to store more apps and games as the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, both have the same internal memory and a SD card slot that admits up to 512 GB.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy M21. They have the same number of cores and a 4 GB RAM memory. The Galaxy M21 counts with greater battery performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 33 percent bigger battery capacity. The Samsung Galaxy M21 takes a lot better photos and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a way tinier diafragm aperture which is not nice for taking pictures and videos in low-light environments, it also counts with a much higher video quality, a way larger sensor capturing way better quality photographs and videos and a camera in the back with lot more mega-pixels.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.