Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 82.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 9.0 Pie, 8.1 Oreo |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-03-07 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.26 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.14 ounces |
| Black | Black and Blue |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.4 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 394 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Samsung Exynos 7 Octa 7904 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | ARM Cortex-A73 and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 1800 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G71 MP2 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.90 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.32 inches (1/3.1") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 1920 x 1080 (30 fps) (Full HD) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.13 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 5000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.8 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | -- |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M30 has an overall score of 82.4, which is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 score. These phones include Android OS (operating system), but Samsung Galaxy M30 has a more recent 9.0 Pie version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo, so it gives you some additional features. The Samsung Galaxy M30 is an older phone than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but Samsung could make it notably thinner and notably lighter anyway.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little better processing power than Samsung Galaxy M30, although it has less RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a much better looking screen than Galaxy M30, because although it has a way smaller screen, it also counts with a greater pixels quantity in each inch in the screen and a higher resolution of 1440 x 2560 pixels.
Samsung Galaxy M30 counts with a much better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier back-facing camera sensor taking lower quality videos and photos and a way tinier camera aperture which is not favorable for low light photos and videos, and they both have the same video quality and the same video frame rates, the Samsung Galaxy M30 also counts with a better 13 megapixels resolution back camera.
Samsung Galaxy M30 has a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a SD extension slot that supports up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy M30 also has more internal memory capacity. The Samsung Galaxy M30 counts with a little better battery life than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 5000mAh of battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.