Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 85 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10, 9.0 Pie |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-06-18 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.11 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black | Midnight blue and Seawater blue |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | IPS LCD |
| 576 pixels per inch | 409 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 675 SM6150 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 460, 64-bit, 11 nm (Octa-Core 2000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 612 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.18 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 32.00 MP + 16.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.36 inches (1/2.8") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (240 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.78 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
Galaxy M40 has a global score of 85, which is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's global score of 80.1. Galaxy M40 is an older cellphone than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but it's lighter and way thinner anyway. These phones have Android OS (operating system), but Galaxy M40 has the older 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy M40, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, it also counts with more pixels per screen inch and a higher 1440 x 2560 resolution. Samsung Galaxy M40 has a much better memory to install applications and games or saving photos and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a SD memory card expansion slot that holds a maximum of 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy M40 also has 128 GB internal storage capacity.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little bit better processing power than Galaxy M40, although it has a lower amount of RAM memory, they both have 8 cores. The Galaxy M40 captures much better pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is not recommended for low-light photography and video and a smaller camera sensor providing a worse image quality, it also counts with a much more megapixels camera in the back and a much higher 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with greater battery duration than Galaxy M40, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3500mAh.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.