Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 87.7 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-09-11 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.45 x 3.00 x 0.37 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.51 ounces |
| Black | Black and White |
| Plastic | Plastic and Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2340 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 576 pixels per inch | 385 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 730 SM7150-AA chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 470, 64-bit, 8 nm (Octa-Core 2200 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 618 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 14.14 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 64.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 11.88 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 7000mAh Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 8.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy M51 is a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having an 87.7 score against 80.1. Even though Samsung Galaxy M51 and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro were released with only 5 months difference, Samsung Galaxy M51 is lighter and thinner. These phones have Android operating system, but the Samsung Galaxy M51 has 10 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a sharper screen than Galaxy M51, because although it has a way smaller display, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch of screen and a better resolution of 1440 x 2560px. Samsung Galaxy M51 counts with a much greater storage capacity to store more games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a SD memory slot that admits up to 512 GB, the Samsung Galaxy M51 also has more internal memory capacity.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more powerful CPU than Samsung Galaxy M51, although it has a lower amount of RAM, they both have 8 processing cores. The Samsung Galaxy M51 has a lot better camera than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller aperture which is worse for capturing photos or video in poorly lited situations, it also counts with a lot better 3840x2160 (4K) video resolution, a back camera with way more MP and a much bigger back-facing camera sensor taking way better quality videos and photos.
Galaxy M51 counts with a very superior battery life than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has a 7000mAh battery capacity.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.