Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 90.8 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.36 x 2.96 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 6.84 ounces |
| Black | Mystic bronze, Mystic gray, Mystic green and Mystic red |
| Plastic | Plastic |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 1000.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED Plus |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.72 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 10.1 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.57 inches (1/1.76") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.67 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4300mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.16 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 has an overall score of 90.8, which is much better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's general score of 80.1. The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 is a a lot thinner and noticeably lighter phone than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although both were released only a couple months apart.
Galaxy Note 20 counts with just a bit better processing power than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note 20 also has 4 GB more RAM memory. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little more vivid display than Galaxy Note 20, because although it has a lot smaller display, it also counts with a higher 1440 x 2560 pixels resolution and a better number of pixels per screen inch.
Samsung Galaxy Note 20 takes greater pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not so good for low light captures, and they both have a same resolution back-facing camera, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 also counts with a way bigger camera sensor shooting lot higher quality photographs and videos and a much higher video quality.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a quite bigger storage capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note 20, because although it has only 64 GB internal storage capacity, it also counts with a slot for an SD memory card that holds up to 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features just a bit longer battery lifetime than Galaxy Note 20, because it has a 4500mAh battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, Galaxy Note 20 is also cheap compared to the other phone.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.