Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 98.9 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 13, 12, 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-08-21 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.49 x 3.04 x 0.32 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.34 ounces |
| Black | Mystic black, Mystic bronze and Mystic white |
| Plastic | Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass Victus) and Stainless steel |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 1300.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.9 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 3088 x 1440 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 494 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.7 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 865+ SM8250-AB (7 nm) chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 585, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 3000 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 12 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 650 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.81 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 108.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.80 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.75 inches (1/1.33") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 7680 x 4320 (24 fps) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 13.64 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | 5G, 5G, LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 10.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has a score of 98.9, which is way better than Galaxy XCover FieldPro's 80.1 score. The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra is a much thinner and lighter cellphone than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although they were released only a couple months apart. Both of these devices have Android OS (Operating System), but the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra has older 13 version while Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo version.
The Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit sharper screen than Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra, because although it has a bit worse resolution of 1440 x 2560px and a really smaller display, it also counts with a bit more pixels per inch of screen. Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with just a bit better hardware performance than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra also has a larger amount of RAM memory.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra takes much clearer pictures and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier aperture which is not recommended for shooting photographs in low-light situations, it also counts with a lot bigger sensor, a lot higher 7680x4320 video quality and a back camera with a much better 108 mega-pixels resolution.
The Samsung Galaxy Note 20 Ultra counts with much more storage for games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has an external memory slot that allows up to 1000 GB and 128 GB internal memory. Galaxy Note 20 Ultra's battery life is very similar to the Galaxy XCover FieldPro one.
The Galaxy Note 20 Ultra costs more money than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, but you can get a much better phone for that few extra dollars.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.