Compare phones
Samsung Galaxy Note 3
Dual SIMN9002
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 81.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 5.0, 4.4.4, 4.4, 4.3 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2013-09-04 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.95 x 3.12 x 0.33 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.93 ounces |
| Black | Black, Pink and White |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 265.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 1080 x 1920 pixels (Full HD) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 386 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | Capacitive, Multi-touch |
| 8.9 | 8.9 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 800 MSM8974 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Krait 400 (Quad-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 3 GB (800 MHz) RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 330 (450 MHz) GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSD, microSDHC (up to 64 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 9.46 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 13.00 MP + 2.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/2.20 aperture |
| -- | 31.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.33 inches (1/3.06") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (120 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 9.68 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA, HSUPA, UMTS, EDGE, GPRS, GSM and CDMA |
| Nano SIM | Micro SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 7.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li-Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| -- | 528 hours standby time 25 hours talk time |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| -- | Infra-red port |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | -- |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 is just a bit better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting a general score of 81.2 against 80.1. Both of these phones include Android operating system, but Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has the previous 5.0 version and Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Samsung Galaxy Note 3 body is way lighter and much thinner than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, despite of the fact that it was released many years before.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a little better performance than Galaxy Note 3, because although it has doesn't have an additional GPU, it also counts with a greater amount of RAM memory and a greater number of cores (and faster). Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has a screen that's very similar to Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's display, because although the Samsung Galaxy Note 3 has way lesser pixels per screen inch and a way worse 1920 x 1080 pixels resolution, it also counts with a little bit bigger screen.
The Galaxy Note 3 takes better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a lot tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light photos and video and a smaller sensor taking lower quality videos and photos, it also counts with a way better 3840x2160 video quality and a back-facing camera with more mega-pixels.
Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro counts with a much bigger memory capacity for games and applications than Galaxy Note 3, and although they both have exactly the same internal storage, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has an external SD slot that supports a maximum of 512 GB. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a superior battery duration than Galaxy Note 3, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity against 3200mAh.
Galaxy Note 3 is not only the best phones in our current comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other ones, which makes it a no doubt choice.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.