Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 80.4 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2017-07-07 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.04 x 2.91 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black | Black, Blue, Gold and Silver |
| Plastic | -- |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 611.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 5.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 515 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.6 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Samsung Exynos 8 Octa 8890 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Exynos M1and ARM Cortex-A53, 64-bit, 14 nm (Octa-Core 2300 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 4 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-T880 MP12 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.27 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 64 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 256 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 10.78 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 5.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 26.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.4 inches (1/2.5") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (30 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| 8.14 | 9.57 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G) and HSPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.1 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3200mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.2 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 4.2 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
Galaxy Note Fan Edition is just a bit better than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro, getting an 80.4 score against 80.1. Galaxy Note Fan Edition's construction is notably thinner and lighter than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, despite of the fact that it was released 3 years before. Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit more vivid screen than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because although it has a little bit smaller screen, and they both have exactly the same resolution of 1440 x 2560px, the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro also counts with a bit more pixels per screen inch.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a slightly better memory capacity for games and applications than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, and although they both have the same 64 GB internal storage capacity, the Galaxy XCover FieldPro also has a SD card slot that admits a maximum of 512 GB. Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition. Both of them have 8 cores and 4 GB of RAM memory.
The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a really longer battery lifetime than Samsung Galaxy Note Fan Edition, because it has 4500mAh of battery capacity instead of 3200mAh. Galaxy Note Fan Edition shoots much clearer photographs and videos than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a smaller diafragm aperture, and they both have a same resolution back camera, the Galaxy Note Fan Edition also counts with a way better (4K) video resolution and a bigger back camera sensor shooting better quality videos and pictures.
Galaxy Note Fan Edition not only is the best devices in our comparison, but it's also a bargain compared to the other devices, which makes it very easy to pick between these devices.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.