Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 89 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | -- |
| 2020-04-04 | 2019-08-23 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 5.94 x 2.83 x 0.31 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 5.89 ounces |
| Black | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura white |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass (Corning Gorilla Glass 6) |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | $ 950.00 |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.3 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2280 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Dynamic AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 400 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Qualcomm Snapdragon 855 SM8150 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Kryo 485, 64-bit, 7 nm (Octa-Core 2840 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 8 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Adreno 640 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.63 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 256 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | No SD card slot |
| 11.74 | 13.3 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 10.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.50 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1280 x 720 (960 fps) (HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.23 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM, Dual SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 3500mAh Li - Ion Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| -- | Wireless Charging |
| 6.32 | 5.44 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
| -- | FM Radio |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 is much better than the Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, having an 89 score against 80.1. Galaxy Note10 is a a lot lighter and incredibly thinner cellphone than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, although both were released with only a few months difference. The Galaxy Note10 features just a little better processing power than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 also has more RAM memory.
Galaxy XCover FieldPro has a little sharper screen than Galaxy Note10, because although it has a bit smaller screen, it also counts with a better quantity of pixels per inch in the display and a better 1440 x 2560px resolution. Samsung Galaxy Note10 shoots way better photographs and videos than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have a same size back camera sensor, the same resolution back facing camera and the same diafragm aperture, the Samsung Galaxy Note10 also has a lot higher (4K) video definition.
Galaxy Note10 features a greater memory for applications and games than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has no external memory card slot, it also counts with more internal storage. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro has better battery duration than Galaxy Note10, because it has a 29% more battery size.
Despite of being the best phone in our comparison, the Galaxy Note10 is also cheaper than the Galaxy XCover FieldPro.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.