Compare phones
| Global Score | |
| 80.1 | 86.2 |
| Basic Information | |
| Samsung | Samsung |
| Android 8.0 Oreo | Android 11, 10 |
| 2020-04-04 | 2020-01-21 |
| 6.24 x 3.18 x 0.56 inches | 6.44 x 3.00 x 0.34 inches |
| 9.03 ounces | 7.02 ounces |
| Black | Aura black, Aura glow and Aura red |
| Plastic | Aluminum and Glass |
| -- | Scratch-Resistant Glass |
| $ 1105.00 | -- |
| Display / Screen | |
| 5.1 inches | 6.7 inches |
| 2560 x 1440 pixels (Quad HD / 2K) | 2400 x 1080 pixels |
| -- | Super AMOLED |
| 576 pixels per inch | 393 pixels per inch |
| No touch screen | No touch screen |
| 8.9 | 8.1 |
| Performance | |
| Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset | Samsung Exynos 9810 chipset |
| Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor | Exynos M3 and ARM Cortex-A55, 64-bit, 10 nm (Octa-Core 2700 MHz) processor |
| 4 GB RAM | 6 GB RAM |
| Mali-G72 MP18 GPU | Mali-G72 MP18 GPU |
| 9.45 | 9.54 |
| Storage | |
| 64 GB internal memory | 128 GB internal memory |
| microSDXC (up to 512 GB) external memory slot | microSDXC (up to 1000 GB) external memory slot |
| 11.74 | 15.38 |
| Camera | |
| 12.00 MP + 8.00 MP | 12.00 MP + 32.00 MP |
| f/1.50 aperture | f/1.70 aperture |
| -- | 27.00mm focal length |
| 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor | 0.39 inches (1/2.55") sensor |
| 1920 x 1080 (Full HD) video resolution | 3840 x 2160 (60 fps) (4K) video resolution |
| -- | 1920 x 1080 (240 fps) (Full HD) slow motion video |
| 8.14 | 10.34 |
| Networks | |
| Wi-Fi | Wi-Fi |
| Mobile Hotspot | Mobile Hotspot |
| LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA | LTE-A (4G), LTE (4G), HSPA+ (4G), HSDPA and HSUPA |
| Nano SIM | Nano SIM |
| 6.7 | 6.7 |
| Battery Life | |
| 4500mAh Battery | 4500mAh Li - Polymer Battery |
| Removable Battery | Non-Removable Battery |
| 6.32 | 6.32 |
| Other Features | |
| Bluetooth 5.0 | Bluetooth 5.0 |
| GPS | GPS |
| NFC | NFC |
| Fingerprint ID Scanner | Fingerprint ID Scanner |
| Accelerometer, Barometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor | Accelerometer, Compass, Gyroscope, Light Sensor and Proximity Sensor |
Comparison review
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a score of 86.2, which is slightly better than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro's global score of 80.1. Both of these phones work with Android operating system, but the Galaxy Note10 Lite has the previous 11 version while Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro has Android 8.0 Oreo. The Galaxy Note10 Lite construction is noticeably thinner and lighter than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, even though both of them were released only 2 months apart.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite has a little bit better performance than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, and although they both have the same number of cores, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also has a higher amount of RAM. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro features a bit better looking screen than Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite, because although it has a much smaller display, it also counts with a greater screen pixels density and a better 1440 x 2560 resolution.
The Galaxy Note10 Lite features a way better camera than Samsung Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because although it has a tinier diafragm aperture which is not good for low light photos and videos, and they both have a same resolution back camera and a same size back-facing camera sensor, the Galaxy Note10 Lite also counts with a way better (4K) video definition.
Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite counts with a much better memory to install games and applications than Galaxy XCover FieldPro, because it has 128 GB internal storage and a SD card slot that allows up to 1000 GB. The Galaxy XCover FieldPro and the Samsung Galaxy Note10 Lite both count with really similar batteries performance.
Disclaimer: As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.